I previously analyzed a debate between Roger Ver and Tone Vays. I objectively examined their arguments and talking points. I overcame my temptations to use the words: liar, dishonest and hypocrite. In other words I avoided using the proper terminology in order to be politically correct.
I don't know why today, his recent tweet was just one of the many examples of his manipulative personality, but I decided to elaborate on this one:

Roger Ver on Twitter
“We just finished our August payroll. About half of our team opted for #BitcoinCash Average BTC Fee: $8.90Average BCH Fee: 1.5 cents”

There  are so much to say about this tweet, but let us not dismiss the big  picture: his message is that Bitcoin fees are high and he has the  solution, Bitcoin Cash. I will not judge if that is a message worth  spreading or not, instead I concentrate on the methods he has chosen to  spread this message.
Now that we got this out of the way, let's take a look at how many lies can be crammed into 140 characters.

Bitcoin.com Mining Pool

Roger Ver has his own Bitcoin mining pool. One of the very few power mining pools have is  selecting transactions. He could create transactions and build them into  a block he mines. The only reason not to do this would be if he wants  to bitch about fees on twitter.

Or is it unethical? If you consider it yes, then you must consider many mining pool services are unethical, like ViaBTC's transaction accelerator.  And anyway, this would not be the first time Roger Ver abuses his  administrator access. In 2012 he got scammed by a customer of his, as a response he posted his personal information on Bitcointalk, including his phone number, IP address,  Blockchain.info's confidential information, including his guid,  shared_key, secret_key and secret_phase. After that info was public,  anyone could delete his wallet from blockchain.info's server. Let's just  say some moral hazard is a non-issue for him.

Furthermore his pool mined three blocks today and two of them were  not even half full. How much of a hypocrite must you be to do that?

How Bitcoin Payroll Works

Is  the "first Bitcoin investor" so incompetent he does not even have in  place a proper Bitcoin payroll? Pay to many is one of the simplest  Bitcoin transaction type. If you make the payment as a pay to many  payment, the cost would've been 8 times smaller.
If you have 50 employees you pay every month in the same time don't make 50 transactions, but only one big with many outputs.

Nicolas Dorier on Twitter
“@BitcoinsSG @rogerkver 1txin=148 b, 1txout=34 b, 1tx=10 b50 tx + 50 txin + 100 txout = 11kVersustx +1 txin + 51 txout=1,8k. Indeed 1,3USD per employee”

So  it's $1.3 per employee. But wait Nicolas was assuming Roger Ver was not  lying and the average Bitcoin transaction fee today is indeed $8.9.

Even His Numbers Are Lies

Today is 2017-09-02. Average bitcoin transaction fees were exactly $8.9 on 2017-08-25, 8 days ago. Coincidentally it was an  all time high. Mystery solved: he cherry picked that number, because he  forgot to bitch about it back then.
I am not even going to search  figure out if he lies about the Bitcoin Cash transaction fees. I leave  this exercise for my readers.

Update: Opportunity Cost

A  counter argument against pay to many is the opportunity cost.  Apparently it is too much hassle for a Bitcoin CEO to do a pay-to-many  transaction. His time is more valuable. Fair enough argument. It's  simpler to not bother with implementing an efficient payroll. But you  are using Bitcoin in an unusual way and most people, who are using  Bitcoin don't have to pay out 50 employees monthly, so making it seem  like this is a common problem is unfair. At this point this tweet is all  about to start a public outcry on how terribly bad Bitcoin user  experience the Bitcoin CEOs, who are too lazy to use Bitcoin in the  proper way have.

Average Transaction Fees vs P2[W]PKH Transaction Fees

There  is another catch. The average Bitcoin fees are terrible metric. If I we  make 10 200 bytes transactions and there is one transaction that's  100KB, the average transaction size won't be anywhere near 200 bytes,  where the transaction fee what matters for normal users is the 200 bytes  transaction. You, me and other individual Bitcoin users are not paying  average transaction fees. We are sending P2PKH or P2WPKH transactions,  usually with one input and two outputs. These are the smallest frequent  transactions on the Blockchain. Guess what would be the highest fee you  would pay at the time of writing to confirm as soon as possible for such  transaction? 350sat/byte*200byte = 70000 satoshi -> $3.2. This is  the absolute highest you would pay, not the average, nor the lowest.  Here I used P2PKH transaction sizes, with segwit, this absolute highest  number would be 40% less. In fact, if everyone would use segwit, this  number would be 4 times less.

Notice how we got from 8.9$ average fees to $1.92 absolute highest fees? Consider  full segwit adoption and we have 80 cents absolute highest fees. What  would be the average? I don't know, maybe 40 cents? Who cares, the point  is: nowhere near $9.

You know what, I'm going to crash you in your own game. Take a look at this Bitcoin Cash block. Average BCH Fee: $44.30!

The Icing On The Cake

Notice, how he accidentally admits he was only able to brainwash half of his team:

Roger Ver on Twitter
“We just finished our August payroll. About half of our team opted for #BitcoinCash Average BTC Fee: $8.90Average BCH Fee: 1.5 cents”

ConclusionThere  was a time when Roger Ver was one of my hero and he made me very  excited about Bitcoin and its potential. I even kept telling others  excuses when he blatantly lied that "everything is fine with MtGox, the current banking system is the issue with the withdrawals." Which of course resulted many losing money.

However his toxic behavior during the last couple of years made me be ashamed of myself for ever advocating him.

Nick Szabo 🔑 on Twitter
“@hq83bnn9 @rogerkver Yes. Ignorant pumpers who lobby to impose their hype on blockchain design are a continuing major risk to secure integrity of blockchains.”

via medium by @nopara73

Share this post